Archives
Categories
- Future (48)
- Housing Market (24)
- Life Lease (2)
- Market Studies (12)
- Marketing (15)
- News (27)
- Senior Housing (37)
- Seniors' Housing (59)
- Virtual Retirement (3)
RSS Feed
Newsletter Sign Up
Posts Tagged ‘Retirement’
The 80/20 Rule as It Applies to Seniors Housing
Friday, August 5th, 2011
I have always wanted to improve my time management skills—who doesn’t? So I bought a couple of books, The 80/20 Principle by Richard Koch being one of them. The 80/20 Principle basically says that 80% of your outputs result from 20% of your inputs. The principle works in all kinds of ways, even in the criminal word. Apparently 80% of the crimes are committed by 20% of the criminals.
(In the US the 80/20 rule also refers to the Federal Fair Housing Act as it applies to communities that are designated for seniors—at least 80% of the units must be occupied by someone over the mandated age, 55 or 62 or whatever.)
So all this got me thinking about the world of service-enriched seniors’ housing and how the rule could be applied there. Here are some possibilities:
• 80% of resident satisfaction is attributable to 20% of operational efforts.
• 80% of food satisfaction is due to 20% of menu items.
• 80% of profits is due to 20% of effort.
• 80% of positive word-of-mouth marketing comes from 20% of residents.
• 80% of complaints come from 20% of residents.
• 80% of internal productivity advances are suggested by 20% of employees.
• 80% of new residents come from 20% of marketing efforts.
Operators who are able to figure out the 80/20 distribution in their communities are in a position to make a huge contribution to resident satisfaction as well as to the bottom line. After all, if the principle works in the world of crime, it must certainly work in the world of seniors’ housing.
Tags: Assisted Living, Retirement, Seniors' Housing, Supportive housing
Posted in Marketing, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Primary Market Areas
Tuesday, July 26th, 2011
Historically, market areas in the seniors’ housing industry in Canada have been defined for the service enriched segment of the market. Primary market areas (PMAs) are considered to be those areas from which 75-80% of the residents of a project will come. Sometimes radiuses are used, 10 miles being a popular one as in “This is a 10 mile business”. Occasionally the 10 mile rule even works but it is a risky thing to hang your financing on. Bridges, municipal boundaries, socio-economic neighborhood characteristics, competing projects—any of these, plus dozens of other factors, can and do affect the determination of primary and secondary market areas.
And of course there is the big one, the location of children. From the perspective of market analysis it would be comforting to think that the location of children is a neutral factor when it comes to estimating demand from primary and secondary market areas because it is a difficult factor to estimate. But it is far from neutral. It may even be as important as the presence of seniors themselves in a market area. Job-generating market areas will attract more seniors than they lose, which is why Alberta attracts and retains more people over the age of 65 than BC (strange but true).
As is almost always the case in Canada, there is very little hard data indicating whether the definition of primary market areas has any basis in fact at all, beyond the research Lumina has done with the BC Senior Living Association. Operators know where their residents come from of course but there has been no systematic collection and analysis of data that shows how reliable the 75-80% estimate really is.
But things are different in the US, where the industry sees the value of research and actually spends money on it! Wow – what a concept. The most recent NIC Insider Newsletter references a 2003 study that found that 22.5% of a large sample of new residents moving to CCRCs (Continuing Care Retirement Communities) had moved from farther than 15 miles away. Results of this study have been supported, in a way, by a just-published Reuters/University of Michigan survey. Of respondents to that survey aged 70+, 20.4% said that where they live was not convenient from the perspective of where their children live. NIC sees this as supporting the results of the 2003 survey and I suppose in a very indirect way it does.
Tags: Aging, Aging in place, Housing Development, Housing Market, Market Study, Retirement, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Market Studies, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Long term care insurance
Tuesday, March 8th, 2011
I remember having a conversation with a prominent operator of seniors housing and care communities in BC a number of years ago. We were discussing affordability and he said he was not concerned about affordability in the future because he was sure more and more people would buy long term care insurance as they came to realize the limits of public funding.
In the US however, where you might expect the demand for long term care insurance to be significantly greater than it is in Canada, the largest national insurer, MetLife, has recently dropped out of the long term care market, citing financial challengers as the reason for dropping coverage. There are four major providers in Canada and it would be interesting to know how active their business is in this field.
Tags: Aging, insurance, long term care, long term care insurance, Retirement, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Future, Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
More on the integration/segregation issue
Tuesday, February 8th, 2011
Insights and Innovation: The State of Seniors Housing analyzes data from the 92 projects submitted to the Design for Aging Review (DFAR) in 2010. The report is a collaboration between the American Institute of Architects and Perkins Eastman Architects.
One of the insights of the report is that the traditional distinction between independent living and assisted living is becoming increasingly blurred “as a greater number of communities offer independent living plus services” as opposed to independent living as well as assisted living. For example, one of the winners was Sun City Palace Tsukaguchi in Osaka, a 760 unit CCRC that offers independent living with services as well as a skilled nursing facility, but no assisted living component. The continuum at this community is provided through increasingly supportive in-home care, rather than through transition to a designated assisted living environment. Another winner was the Villa at San Luis Rey, which has licensed all its units as assisted living but markets them as independent living with services. Blurry indeed!
The report explores many other fascinating issues and is available on-line at www.aia.org.
Tags: Aging, Aging in place, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Retirement, Seniors' Housing, Supportive housing
Posted in Future, Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Integration or segregation of assisted living services in independent living communities
Wednesday, January 26th, 2011
I have posted about this before and there is also a section on the subject in my book The Future of Seniors Housing: Planning, Building and Operating Successful Seniors Housing Projects (now available on our website and soon to be available on Amazon etc).
The thing is, I think I have changed my mind since the book was published (that would be last month). Aha you may think, she is already cleverly planning the second edition. That’s not true although I do think about another book from time to time. What has changed my mind is talking to many people in the industry in recent weeks about the provision of assisted living services in retirement communities. The Lumina Group is working with a new entrant to the industry and it is up to us to advise him about the right strategy—he has no preconceived notions and no established model he is unwilling to deviate from. Should he plan to deliver personal care services to his residents who need them wherever in the building they may live, or should he develop a separate wing for his assisted living customers?
The book comes down on the side of the segregationist model although when you think about it, the term “segregation” has so many negative connotations that its use should immediately raise red flags. But the support for the segregationist model reflects quite specific circumstances in which the assisted living residents are really very frail and receiving significant levels of personal care—hours per day, not minutes per day. In those situations, more independent residents may feel very uncomfortable living cheek by jowl with their much frailer neighbours and as Victor Regnier has pointed out, the feelings may well be mutual. (See my book for further information, or any of Victor Regnier’s of course).
But when daily hours of care are not so extreme, most industry people we have polled strongly support integration. I will go into more detail about why in later posts. In the meantime, I am working on the second edition of The Future of Seniors Housing.
Tags: Assisted Living, Housing Development, Marketing, Retirement, Seniors, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Future, Housing Market, Marketing, News, Seniors' Housing | 3 Comments »

Subscribe