Archives
Categories
- Future (48)
- Housing Market (24)
- Life Lease (2)
- Market Studies (12)
- Marketing (15)
- News (27)
- Senior Housing (37)
- Seniors' Housing (59)
- Virtual Retirement (3)
RSS Feed
Newsletter Sign Up
Posts Tagged ‘Housing Development’
Construction activity down but prices at high end up
Friday, November 4th, 2011
The National Real Estate Investor just reported that 14,942 units of private pay service-enriched and skilled nursing facility beds are under construction in the US. That’s up modestly year-over-year although well below pre-recession levels. But it’s way below the peak of 1998, when an astonishing 57,800 similar units were under construction. Of course a lot of those projects eventually went broke thanks to over-supply in many markets. I wonder what the Canadian situation is? Sadly, no one has any idea.
But prices for high end US projects have been climbing steadily since the recession. Reports from NIC and Real Capital Analytics indicate that in the first quarter of 2008, the top 25 percent of project prices was about $169,000 per unit. That number fell to about $101,000 a unit by the fourth quarter of 2009. Prices for the properties in the top quartile have increased since then to $170,141 per unit. That’s a big jump.
One of the transactions highlighted in the report is in Raleigh North Carolina. Prudential Real Estate Investors sold the project in 2004 for $29 million and just bought it back for $53 million from the same company they sold it to. Some improvements were made in the meantime (eg 14 cottages added) but it sounds on the surface like a very good deal for the interim owner.
Tags: Housing Development, Housing Market, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Primary Market Areas
Tuesday, July 26th, 2011
Historically, market areas in the seniors’ housing industry in Canada have been defined for the service enriched segment of the market. Primary market areas (PMAs) are considered to be those areas from which 75-80% of the residents of a project will come. Sometimes radiuses are used, 10 miles being a popular one as in “This is a 10 mile business”. Occasionally the 10 mile rule even works but it is a risky thing to hang your financing on. Bridges, municipal boundaries, socio-economic neighborhood characteristics, competing projects—any of these, plus dozens of other factors, can and do affect the determination of primary and secondary market areas.
And of course there is the big one, the location of children. From the perspective of market analysis it would be comforting to think that the location of children is a neutral factor when it comes to estimating demand from primary and secondary market areas because it is a difficult factor to estimate. But it is far from neutral. It may even be as important as the presence of seniors themselves in a market area. Job-generating market areas will attract more seniors than they lose, which is why Alberta attracts and retains more people over the age of 65 than BC (strange but true).
As is almost always the case in Canada, there is very little hard data indicating whether the definition of primary market areas has any basis in fact at all, beyond the research Lumina has done with the BC Senior Living Association. Operators know where their residents come from of course but there has been no systematic collection and analysis of data that shows how reliable the 75-80% estimate really is.
But things are different in the US, where the industry sees the value of research and actually spends money on it! Wow – what a concept. The most recent NIC Insider Newsletter references a 2003 study that found that 22.5% of a large sample of new residents moving to CCRCs (Continuing Care Retirement Communities) had moved from farther than 15 miles away. Results of this study have been supported, in a way, by a just-published Reuters/University of Michigan survey. Of respondents to that survey aged 70+, 20.4% said that where they live was not convenient from the perspective of where their children live. NIC sees this as supporting the results of the 2003 survey and I suppose in a very indirect way it does.
Tags: Aging, Aging in place, Housing Development, Housing Market, Market Study, Retirement, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Market Studies, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
All you condo-sceptics out there take note:
Friday, June 10th, 2011
Some of you may have seen the inaugural copy of the Westbridge Group Valuation Partner/Lumina Services newsletter. If you haven’t seen it, it is pretty amazing even if I do say so myself. One of the articles discusses the question of condos with services—whether they make any sense from an investment point of view. Many people argue that they don’t because the resale market is so much smaller than the market for a conventional condo. The article concludes that in the case of the two projects analyzed—Tapestry at O’Keefe in Vancouver and Mayfair Gardens in Port Coquitlam—price appreciation did in fact occur, although at a somewhat reduced rate compared to the standard condo market.
I just happened to notice a unit at Tapestry listed for sale in yesterday’s Vancouver Sun. It’s a large two bedroom unit—1,236 square feet in “picture perfect condition” (according to the realtor), list price $728,000. I immediately referred to our data base on service-enriched condos, available for a very modest price from the estimable Landcor folks. The same unit has sold twice before, once when the project opened in 2003 for $405,421 and again eight months later in February 2004 for $470,000.
If the unit sells for its list price, that represents an 8% per annum increase in value since 2004. Over the same time period, the price of the benchmark apartment condo in Vancouver Westside increased by an identical 8% per annum. So no reduction at all for the mandatory service package, assuming the unit sells as listed of course. We will keep our eyes open and let you know what happens in future posts.
Tags: Condominium, Housing Development, Housing Market, Seniors' Housing, Service Enriched Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Housing Markets
Tuesday, March 29th, 2011
Here in Canada and especially in BC we have been subject to numerous warnings that our housing markets are overheated and about to collapse, much as they have in the US. All of us in the seniors’ housing industry are very aware of the impact of falling house prices on occupancy levels. So it was interesting to read an article in a recent Economist about international houses prices and the extent to which they are over or under-valued based on the long run average relationship of house prices to rents. The most over-valued market in the world is Australia’s, where current house prices are 56.4% above that long-run average relationship. Hong Kong is a close second at 53.7% followed by France (48%), Spain (43.7%), Sweden (39.5%) and then Britain, New Zealand and the Netherlands in the 20s. Canada is well down the list at only 11.4%. The US, after years of recession, is only 3% above its long-run average and poor Japan (pre-earthquake) is 35% below. Owning has been getting cheaper in Japan relative to renting for more than 20 years.
The same issue of the Economist contains a fascinating graph developed by Robert Shiller, of the famous Case-Shiller index that tracks house prices in the US. The graph charts real house prices (ie adjusted for the impact of inflation) in the US over the period from 1890 to 2010. For most of those 120 years, real house prices stayed relatively constant, with the exception of the depression and war years, when they fell well below 100. But the graph charts an astonishing rise in real house prices starting in the late 1990s. Over the next few years real houses prices doubled before falling precipitously in the recession. As the Economist puts it: “The run-up in values was not just unprecedented, it was obviously lunatic.” It’s funny how the human race seems completely unable to avoid market hysteria, whether it’s tulips or houses.
Find the article here:
http://www.economist.com/node/18250431?story_id=18250431
Tags: Housing Development, Housing Market, Seniors, Seniors' Housing, The Economist
Posted in Housing Market, Senior Housing | Comments Off
Integration or segregation of assisted living services in independent living communities
Wednesday, January 26th, 2011
I have posted about this before and there is also a section on the subject in my book The Future of Seniors Housing: Planning, Building and Operating Successful Seniors Housing Projects (now available on our website and soon to be available on Amazon etc).
The thing is, I think I have changed my mind since the book was published (that would be last month). Aha you may think, she is already cleverly planning the second edition. That’s not true although I do think about another book from time to time. What has changed my mind is talking to many people in the industry in recent weeks about the provision of assisted living services in retirement communities. The Lumina Group is working with a new entrant to the industry and it is up to us to advise him about the right strategy—he has no preconceived notions and no established model he is unwilling to deviate from. Should he plan to deliver personal care services to his residents who need them wherever in the building they may live, or should he develop a separate wing for his assisted living customers?
The book comes down on the side of the segregationist model although when you think about it, the term “segregation” has so many negative connotations that its use should immediately raise red flags. But the support for the segregationist model reflects quite specific circumstances in which the assisted living residents are really very frail and receiving significant levels of personal care—hours per day, not minutes per day. In those situations, more independent residents may feel very uncomfortable living cheek by jowl with their much frailer neighbours and as Victor Regnier has pointed out, the feelings may well be mutual. (See my book for further information, or any of Victor Regnier’s of course).
But when daily hours of care are not so extreme, most industry people we have polled strongly support integration. I will go into more detail about why in later posts. In the meantime, I am working on the second edition of The Future of Seniors Housing.
Tags: Assisted Living, Housing Development, Marketing, Retirement, Seniors, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Future, Housing Market, Marketing, News, Seniors' Housing | 3 Comments »
55+ Housing in the US still weak
Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010
A recent report from the National Association of Homebuilders clearly indicates that active adult housing in the US is still in recession. The 55+ single-family Housing Market Index (HMI) measures builder sentiment based on current sales, prospective buyer traffic and anticipated six-month sales for the 55+ single-family market. A number greater than 50 indicates that more builders view conditions as good than poor. In the third quarter of 2010, the index came in at 15, a five-point drop from the third quarter of the previous year. Present sales dropped four points, to 15. Expected sales (six months into the future) dropped six points, to 24. And traffic of prospective buyers fell seven points, to 11.
The condo HMI also dropped from the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010.
This is hardly surprising news. With the overall US housing market still very soft, strength in the active adult sector would be anomalous. All those folks planning to move to Sun City first have to sell their houses to someone else.
Tags: Aging, Housing Development, Housing Market, Housing Market Index, Retirement, Senior Housing, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off

Subscribe