Archives
Categories
- Future (48)
- Housing Market (24)
- Life Lease (2)
- Market Studies (12)
- Marketing (15)
- News (27)
- Senior Housing (37)
- Seniors' Housing (59)
- Virtual Retirement (3)
RSS Feed
Newsletter Sign Up
Archive for the ‘Seniors' Housing’ Category
90 is the new 80
Tuesday, November 29th, 2011
In case you haven’t been keeping up, 90 is the new 80 or more precisely, 90 is the new 85. A recent report from the US Census Bureau (I know what you are thinking—why doesn’t she ever reference Canadian data in her posts? Because there isn’t any is the short answer to that question.) points out that among the seniors population as a whole, the 90+ group has been growing the most rapidly. When all of the baby boomers reach the age of 85 (in 2050), 2% of the US population will be 90+ which is pretty amazing if you stop to think about it. That is a lot of 90 year olds.
What are today’s 90 year olds like?
• Women outnumber men 3 to 1
• 6% of the women are married; 43% of the men (which is one of the big reasons that the vast majority of the residents of seniors housing communities are women—not only do they live longer, they are much more likely to be alone.)
• The likelihood of living in a nursing home rises from 20% between 90 and 94 to 31% between 95 and 99 to 38% for those over 100. These ratios are probably lower than what many people would expect. I usually quote a ratio of 35% of the population over the age of 85 living in nursing homes in Canada but either my estimate is wrong or there is a much higher incidence of institutionalization in Canada. We will try and check this out.
• Not surprisingly, people living in nursing homes have more disabilities than people living in the community although overall, the differences aren’t huge—98% of nursing home residents have disabilities (I don’t know why it isn’t 100%) compared to 81% of people living in the community. But there are major differences in a couple of categories—trouble remembering (73% versus 30%) and needing help with activities of daily living such as bathing and dressing (85% versus 35%).
Tags: Aging, Baby Boomers, long term care, nursing homes, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Future, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
US Market Improving (slowly)
Friday, November 18th, 2011
I know I do go on about the US market, but I find it endlessly fascinating. Of course that’s partly because there is so much data on the US market. We have so little data in Canada that it is usually quite difficult to figure out what’s going on.
The chart below, courtesy of NIC, shows a steady improvement in occupancy levels in independent living (IL) and assisted living (AL) communities in the US since the seniors markets bottomed out in the first quarter of 2010. It’s interesting though, or maybe depressing is the better word, to think about how long and how deep the slide has been, really since the latter part of 2006. Not only that, over the same period of time the 75+ population in the US increased by over 800,000 people. To put that number in perspective, in Canada there are a total of just over two million people over the age of 75.
So while things are getting better, they are still a long way from good, thanks largely to the still extremely sluggish US housing market.
Tags: Aging, Housing Market, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Construction activity down but prices at high end up
Friday, November 4th, 2011
The National Real Estate Investor just reported that 14,942 units of private pay service-enriched and skilled nursing facility beds are under construction in the US. That’s up modestly year-over-year although well below pre-recession levels. But it’s way below the peak of 1998, when an astonishing 57,800 similar units were under construction. Of course a lot of those projects eventually went broke thanks to over-supply in many markets. I wonder what the Canadian situation is? Sadly, no one has any idea.
But prices for high end US projects have been climbing steadily since the recession. Reports from NIC and Real Capital Analytics indicate that in the first quarter of 2008, the top 25 percent of project prices was about $169,000 per unit. That number fell to about $101,000 a unit by the fourth quarter of 2009. Prices for the properties in the top quartile have increased since then to $170,141 per unit. That’s a big jump.
One of the transactions highlighted in the report is in Raleigh North Carolina. Prudential Real Estate Investors sold the project in 2004 for $29 million and just bought it back for $53 million from the same company they sold it to. Some improvements were made in the meantime (eg 14 cottages added) but it sounds on the surface like a very good deal for the interim owner.
Tags: Housing Development, Housing Market, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Numbers: Canada vs. US Nursing Homes
Tuesday, August 16th, 2011
A recent study published by Brown University (July 2011 edition of Health Affairs) shows that between 1999 and 2008 the nursing home population in the US shrank by just over 6% while at the same time the population over the age of 70 increased by just over 8%. The shift is attributed largely to the growth of alternatives such as assisted living.
Here’s another interesting thing to note—in Canada, there were 250,000 nursing home residents in 2008/2009. In the US in the same year there were 1.2 million. Using the standard 10 to 1 ratio suggests that there are twice as many people in Canada in nursing homes as there are in the US on a per capita basis. That is undoubtedly due in large part to the lack of Canadian alternatives, assisted living in particular. Assisted living in the US is almost entirely a private pay phenomenon and when it comes to care, no matter how light, Canadians do not like to pay for it. As a result, the private pay assisted living market in Canada is a very thin one.
On the surface, the impact of twice as many nursing home residents and very few assisted living residents would seem to result in much higher public expenditures in Canada for the elderly compared to the US, particularly in light of recent dramatic cuts to US Medicare and Medicaid budgets (11% reductions). And maybe that is as it should be, although it seems inevitable that Canadian public expenditures on the elderly are going to be spread much more thinly in the future than they are now.
Tags: Aging, American Health Care, Assisted Living, Canadian Health Care System, long term care, Medicaid, Medicare, nursing homes, Seniors, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Future, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
The 80/20 Rule as It Applies to Seniors Housing
Friday, August 5th, 2011
I have always wanted to improve my time management skills—who doesn’t? So I bought a couple of books, The 80/20 Principle by Richard Koch being one of them. The 80/20 Principle basically says that 80% of your outputs result from 20% of your inputs. The principle works in all kinds of ways, even in the criminal word. Apparently 80% of the crimes are committed by 20% of the criminals.
(In the US the 80/20 rule also refers to the Federal Fair Housing Act as it applies to communities that are designated for seniors—at least 80% of the units must be occupied by someone over the mandated age, 55 or 62 or whatever.)
So all this got me thinking about the world of service-enriched seniors’ housing and how the rule could be applied there. Here are some possibilities:
• 80% of resident satisfaction is attributable to 20% of operational efforts.
• 80% of food satisfaction is due to 20% of menu items.
• 80% of profits is due to 20% of effort.
• 80% of positive word-of-mouth marketing comes from 20% of residents.
• 80% of complaints come from 20% of residents.
• 80% of internal productivity advances are suggested by 20% of employees.
• 80% of new residents come from 20% of marketing efforts.
Operators who are able to figure out the 80/20 distribution in their communities are in a position to make a huge contribution to resident satisfaction as well as to the bottom line. After all, if the principle works in the world of crime, it must certainly work in the world of seniors’ housing.
Tags: Assisted Living, Retirement, Seniors' Housing, Supportive housing
Posted in Marketing, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Primary Market Areas
Tuesday, July 26th, 2011
Historically, market areas in the seniors’ housing industry in Canada have been defined for the service enriched segment of the market. Primary market areas (PMAs) are considered to be those areas from which 75-80% of the residents of a project will come. Sometimes radiuses are used, 10 miles being a popular one as in “This is a 10 mile business”. Occasionally the 10 mile rule even works but it is a risky thing to hang your financing on. Bridges, municipal boundaries, socio-economic neighborhood characteristics, competing projects—any of these, plus dozens of other factors, can and do affect the determination of primary and secondary market areas.
And of course there is the big one, the location of children. From the perspective of market analysis it would be comforting to think that the location of children is a neutral factor when it comes to estimating demand from primary and secondary market areas because it is a difficult factor to estimate. But it is far from neutral. It may even be as important as the presence of seniors themselves in a market area. Job-generating market areas will attract more seniors than they lose, which is why Alberta attracts and retains more people over the age of 65 than BC (strange but true).
As is almost always the case in Canada, there is very little hard data indicating whether the definition of primary market areas has any basis in fact at all, beyond the research Lumina has done with the BC Senior Living Association. Operators know where their residents come from of course but there has been no systematic collection and analysis of data that shows how reliable the 75-80% estimate really is.
But things are different in the US, where the industry sees the value of research and actually spends money on it! Wow – what a concept. The most recent NIC Insider Newsletter references a 2003 study that found that 22.5% of a large sample of new residents moving to CCRCs (Continuing Care Retirement Communities) had moved from farther than 15 miles away. Results of this study have been supported, in a way, by a just-published Reuters/University of Michigan survey. Of respondents to that survey aged 70+, 20.4% said that where they live was not convenient from the perspective of where their children live. NIC sees this as supporting the results of the 2003 survey and I suppose in a very indirect way it does.
Tags: Aging, Aging in place, Housing Development, Housing Market, Market Study, Retirement, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Housing Market, Market Studies, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off
Interprovincial Migration to BC (no no it’s not boring!)
Tuesday, July 12th, 2011
Readers of my book and this blog will know that I have what is probably an unhealthy, or at least an unnatural, interest in migration patterns. But anyone who is interested in seniors housing markets, or indeed any other kind of housing market, should pay close attention to who is moving where and for what reason. We just finished a market analysis in Saskatoon. Interprovincial and international migration to Saskatoon has been positive (ie in-migration has exceeded out-migration) for about 4 years now, after at least 40 years of more people leaving than moving in. The impact of that on almost every aspect of life in Saskatoon has been, if not quite profound, certainly noticeable.
Which, then brings me to BC. Immigration from other countries to BC is fairly constant from one year to the next. And almost all immigrants settle in the Lower Mainland, so it is a factor of less interest to other communities. Interprovincial migration on the other hand is hugely variable and affects communities throughout the province. Contrary to the urban myth that BC is a giant magnet for retirees, almost all interprovincial migration depends on economic conditions in BC compared to our eastern neighbours, particularly Alberta.
It sounds simplistic but it really isn’t—when interprovincial migration to BC is positive, things are good. When it’s negative, things are bad.
That’s why it was alarming to see in BC Stat’s First Quarter 2011report on interprovincial migration that for the first time in 9 years, quarterly migration has been negative. The report cautions that numbers are preliminary but states: “we can be reasonably assured that interprovincial migration to BC appears to be trending down”.
That is a sobering thought. In future posts we will talk about the sub-provincial impacts of these changes. As readers of my book know, great information on inter-, intra- and international migration trends is available from your friends at the Canada Revenue Agency. Your friends at Lumina Services pay close attention to this information in our unceasing search for the truth.
Tags: Aging, Housing Market, Migration, Seniors' Housing
Posted in Future, Housing Market, Seniors' Housing | Comments Off

Subscribe 